Frisch v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Winonacounty, Snow, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the-verdict or for a- new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This action was brought to recover damages for the loss of a horse-which the complaint alleges was killed by reason of the failure of the defendant to fence its railroad. On the trial of the cause and at the-close of the evidence* the defendant requested the trial court to instruct the jury to return a verdict in its favor. This was denied, cause submitted to the jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff in the sum of *399$650. The defendant appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
While other errors are assigned by the defendant,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. EmmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Rosse v. St. Paul & Duluth Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Fitzgerald v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Emmons v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curran v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Strand v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Hubert v. Connell Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Brei v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.