Legal Opinion

Mund v. Friedman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1967No. Gen. 10,846PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Sarah Kanner, a resident of Springfield, executed her Last Will and Testament on July 16, 1936, and thereafter, on May 29, 1940, and September 9, 1946, she executed codicils thereto. Following her death on November 9, 1947, her will and codicils were duly admitted to probate. On July 25, 1963, Rose Mund, a beneficiary, filed the instant complaint praying for the partition of certain premises described in the will. Mandel Friedman, a defendant, answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim seeking a construction and interpretation of said will and codicils. Replies were filed to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. OlneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1823
  2. Bruen v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gilbert v. McCrearyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Ryan v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Rickman v. MeierIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schatz v. SchatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. East v. Estate of EastIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Dudley v. NETELERAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Dimond v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Clevenger v. MuellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API