Legal Opinion

Schatz v. Schatz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1988No. 870123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Wilfred Schatz, a son and devisee of Fred A. Schatz, deceased, appeals from two county court orders involving the construction of the testator’s will. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The will provisions pertinent to this appeal are:

“THIRD: I give, devise and bequeath equally unto Richard Schatz and Wilfred Schatz all of my interest in grain bins situated on Section Four (4), Township One Hundred Thirty Five (135) North, Range Ninety-Seven (97) West, Hettinger County, North Dakota, with the right to utilize said bins upon the premises where they are now situated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Bismarck v. CaseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Quandee v. SkeneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Holien v. TrydahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hitz v. Estate of HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of ZimblemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Jordan v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Industrial Commission v. McKenzie County National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ruud v. FrandsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API