Legal Opinion

City of Bristol v. Bostwick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1917PublishedCited by 18 opinions

FROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sullivan County. — Hal H. Haynks, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Justice Gbeeít

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This hill was filed by the city of Bristol and the city board of high school commissioners against William IT. Bostwick, the contractor who had undertaken to erect a new high school building for the city; and against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, surety on Bostwick’s bond, and against several laborers and materialmen.

The bill averred that, in pursuance of chapter 192, of the Acts of 1915, which authorized the city of Bristol to erect a high school and issue bonds for that purpose, the high school commissioners created by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Perkins Oil Co. v. EberhartTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. W. T. Hardison & Co. v. YeamanTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  2. City of Bristol v. BostwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Sioux City v. Western Asphalt Paving Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  4. Cass v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Engert v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API