Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Cooper

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1979No. Docket 77-4635PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant, a police officer, claiming personal injuries in the police station after his arrest for a traffic violation.

Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment and then an amended motion for summary judgment, the gist of which is that defendant police officer is immune from tort liability under the Michigan statutes which reinstated such immunity. Although accompanied by defendant’s affidavit, the amended motion is, by its terms, brought under GCR 1963, 117.2(1). Plaintiff’s response to the motion asserted that the governmental immu nity applied only to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sherbutte v. City of Marine CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Manion v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hammitt v. StraleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Cole v. RifeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Jones v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Jones v. PowellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Newby v. ServissDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
  5. Smith v. YonoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API