Legal Opinion

Manion v. State Highway Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1942No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 41,909PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

I am unable to concur in the opinion proposed by the Chief Justice in this case for the following reasons:

The State, as sovereign, is immune from suit save as it consents to be sued, and any relinquishment of sovereign immunity must be strictly interpreted. United States v. Sherwood, 312 U. S. 584 (61 Sup. Ct. 767, 85 L. Ed. 1058) (decided March 31, 1941), and see authorities therein cited.

There is a distinction between sovereign immunity from suit and sovereign immunity from liability. The latter exists when the sovereign is engaged in a governmental function. The former may be waived…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Detroit v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Longstreet v. County of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gerzeski v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bergner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API