Legal Opinion
McCormick v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 17, 1976No. 173-73PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to the recommended decision, filed March 24,1975, by Trial Judge No aid A. Hogenson, pursuant to Buie 134(h), ¡having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, it is concluded that plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed.
OPINION OE TRIAL JUDGE
Hogenson,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. W. M. Webb, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Melvin McGuire and Alvina McGuire v. United States of America, Rahier Trucking, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lieb v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Boudrot v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1982
- Associated Bicycle Service, Inc. v. United States (In Re Associated Bicycle Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
- Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.