Legal Opinion

Aparacor, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 18, 1977No. 139-73PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Louis Spector, filed April 7, 1976, pursuant to *132Rule 134(h), having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, with minor modifications by the court, it hereby adopts the decision as modified and hereinafter set forth* as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, it is concluded that plaintiff is entitled to recover and judgment is entered for plaintiff with the amount of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Weiss v. WeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Gilmore v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
  3. Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API