Legal Opinion
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 6, 2015No. Case No. 1:10 MD 2196PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT FXFS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In these consolidated proceedings, Plaintiffs allege that dominant firms in the flexible polyurethane foam market engaged in a decade-long conspiracy to fix, raise, and maintain the price of flexible foam products in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. This Court certified a class of Direct Purchasers who bought foam directly from the Defendant firms (see Doc. 1102 at 6-7). Defendant Foamex Innovations, Inc. (“FXI”) moves for summary judgment on Direct Purchasers’ claims…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re GEO Specialty Chemicals Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017