Legal Opinion

Giddens v. Powell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lowndes. Heard before Hon. Jere N. Williams. The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The appellee, George N. Powell, 'filed the present bill for the purpose of having a deed of conveyance, executed by James McQueen and his wife, Jane McQueen, to the respondent, James T. Giddens, appellant, to certain eighty acres of land, cancelled as a cloud upon his title. The respondent filed a demurrer to the bill upon several specified grounds. The cause was not set down for hearing on demurrer, and the court does not seem to have considered it. They are not before us for consideration. We might add, however, that the particular grounds assigned might have been properly overruled. The…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Staples v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Hall v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Rollings v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Pratt Land & Improvement Co. v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API