Legal Opinion

Baltimore Trust Co. v. Zamansky

Baltimore City Superior Court

Decided June 18, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.

The declaration in this case consists of six common counts and a special seventh count. In the special count it is averred that the defendant by his promissory note then overdue promised to pay to the order of Bernstein, Cohen & Co., $300 six months after date * * * and the plaintiff became the holder in due course thereof, but the defendant did not pay the same. The action is brought under the Speedy Judgment Act and the cause of action filed is the promissory note described in the seventh count. This becomes in consequence a part of each count of the declaration.

Rullman, admr., vs. Rullman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaw v. . TobiasNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Murphy v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  3. Russell v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Gusdorff & Joseph v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Parks v. Griffith & Boyd Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API