Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Stubblefield

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 1, 1918PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore. (Stanton, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

This action ,is one in assumpsit and the first six counts in the declaration are the common counts in that form of action. The seventh -count is as follows:

“And for that one Ered.'A. Dolph'on the 24th day of November, 1916, by his promissory note now overdue, promised to pay to himself, or order, $1,000 four months after date, and the defendants endorsed the same to the plaintiff, and jointly and severally guaranteed payment of said note, and the said note was duly presented for payment and was dishonored, whereof the defendant had due notice and did not pay the same.”

The eighth count is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffith v. DiffenderfferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  3. Weckler v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  4. Herrick v. SwomleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  5. Bell v. PrewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coffey v. Derby Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Maszczenski v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Proctor Electric Co. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Lockhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Wood v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API