Legal Opinion
Parks v. Griffith & Boyd Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 28, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the, Circuit Court for Talbot County (Pearce, C. J., Adkins and Hopper, JJ.).
1Opinion of the Court
PattisoN, J.,
delivered tlie opinion of the Court.
The appellee company, engaged in the manufacture of fertilizers in the City of Baltimore, in June, 1910, submitted to the appellants, dealers in fertilizers, of Ohester-town, Maryland, the following written proposition:
“To Messrs. B. E. Parhs & Son,
Post-Office, Ohestertown, County Kent, State Md.
“We will sell you the following named quantities of Fertilizers during Fall Season at prices and terms named below:
Tons. Per Ton. Baas.
Bone Meal. $28. 200
Soft Ground Bone. 24. 167
Special Guano. 22.
Ammoniated Bone Phos. 19.
Fish Bone & Potash. 19.
Royal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Osceola Tribe, No. 11 v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
- Scott v. LearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Dambmann v. RittlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- President of Washington & Baltimore Turnpike Road v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Wheeling Steel & Iron Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Foster-Porter Enterprises, Inc. v. De MareCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Parks v. Griffith & Boyd Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Newbold v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Solter v. Leedom & Worrell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
- Tidewater Oil Co. v. SpoererCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.