Legal Opinion
Kleemann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 2, 2005No. B177466PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner, Gregory Kleemann, claimed industrial injuries from work as a special agent for respondent, State of California. After his claim was tried and submitted to the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) for a decision, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 899 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.) (Bill 899) and required apportionment based on causation under new Labor Code sections 4663 and 4664.
The WCJ vacated submission to address the new apportionment requirements. Kleemann petitioned respondent, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB), for a ruling…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brodie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Rio Linda Union School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Marsh v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- E & J Gallo Winery v. the Worker's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- E.L. Yeager Construction v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.