Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 5, 2021No. 24/20PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Oliver Miller, No. 24, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Biran, J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – ARTICLE 21 OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS – SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION – RIGHT OF ACCUSED TO CONFRONT WITNESSES – The Court of Appeals held that a trial court does not violate a criminal defendant’s rights to confrontation and cross-examination, where the court allows the technical reviewer of a report analyzing DNA evidence to testify about the results of that analysis, without requiring the primary author of the report to be available for cross-…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Commonwealth v. Elana GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
  3. David Kelly v. State of Maryland, Maryland Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  4. Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API