State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
State of Maryland v. Oliver Miller, No. 24, September Term, 2020. Opinion by Biran, J. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – ARTICLE 21 OF THE MARYLAND DECLARATION OF RIGHTS – SIXTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION – RIGHT OF ACCUSED TO CONFRONT WITNESSES – The Court of Appeals held that a trial court does not violate a criminal defendant’s rights to confrontation and cross-examination, where the court allows the technical reviewer of a report analyzing DNA evidence to testify about the results of that analysis, without requiring the primary author of the report to be available for cross-…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Commonwealth v. Elana GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
- David Kelly v. State of Maryland, Maryland Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Kumar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021