Legal Opinion
County of Orange v. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 18, 1999No. SA CV 96-765-GLT EEXPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ■
TAYLOR, District Judge.
The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs breach of contract and professional negligence claims concerning the County’s 1993 debt issues. The Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs breach of' contract and professional negligence claims concerning the County’s 1994 debt issues.
I. Background
The County alleges S & P was retained in 1993 and 1994 to provide bond rating and investment services to the County. The County and S & P entered…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Compuware Corp v. Moody InvCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Compuware Corp. v. Moody's Investors Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007