Legal Opinion
Gutheil v. Consolidated Edison of New York Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul Wooten, J.
Motion sequence Nos. 009 and Oil are hereby consolidated for disposition.
In motion sequence No. 009, defendant Nico Asphalt Paving Inc. (Nico) moves for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross claims. Defendant Consolidated Edison of New York Company, Inc. (Con Ed) cross-moves for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross claims. In motion sequence No. 011, plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against Nico and Con Ed.
Background
This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff, a former firefighter, brings this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gutheil v. Consolidated Edison of New York Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gutheil v. Consolidated Edison of New York Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013