Legal Opinion
Judd v. H. S. Coe & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the death of a horse owned by her, alleging that it died as a result of lead poisoning caused by feed bought from the defendant. No substantial change can be made in the trial court’s finding. It does, however, contain a number of paragraphs which state testimony offered at the trial and which should not have been included. Beach v. First National Bank, 107 Conn. 1, 5, 138 Atl. 905. There was expert testimony that the horse died as a result of poisoning and that it had at least some of the symptoms of acute lead poisoning; an analysis…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- French v. ViningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Carangelo v. Nutmeg Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Johnson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pearl v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Esserman v. MaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Wells Laundry & Linen Supply Co. v. Acme Fast Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Midwest Game Company v. MFA Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Albers Milling Company v. CarneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.