Legal Opinion

Albers Milling Company v. Carney

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 12, 1960No. 48271PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMAN, Commissioner.

Plaintiff instituted this action in an effort to recover an unpaid balance of $5,-024.28 for feed sold to and money advanced for defendants under the provisions of a turkey financing agreement. Defendants filed an answer, setoff and counterclaim wherein, as a defense to plaintiff’s claim and as the basis for a recovery of damages in the sum of $8,196.47, they alleged that plaintiff had furnished them impure and inferior feed which caused the illness and death of many of their turkeys. At the close of the evidence the court, upon mo-> tion of plaintiff, directed a verdict…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Maybach v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Swift & Co. v. Morgan & SturdivantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Superior Ice & Coal Co. v. Belger Cartage Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Wheatcraft v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Caloric Appliance CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Green v. RALSTON PURNIA COMPANYSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. John T. Ross v. Philip Morris & Company, Ltd., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  5. MFA Cooperative Ass'n of Ash Grove v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API