Legal Opinion

United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 23, 1973No. C-73-0238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHNACKE, District Judge.

This is an action by the United States pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 64a(a) to recover the statutory penalty for violation of 45 U.S.C. § 62(a)(1), a part of the federal Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64b, infra. It is before the Court on pross-motions for summary judgment. The United Transportation Union and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers have filed briefs amicus curiae in support of plaintiff’s motion.

The facts are stipulated: Four employees of defendant went on duty on February 14, 1971, at Richmond, California. They operated one train…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
  3. United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
  4. United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API