United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHNACKE, District Judge.
This is an action by the United States pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 64a(a) to recover the statutory penalty for violation of 45 U.S.C. § 62(a)(1), a part of the federal Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64b, infra. It is before the Court on pross-motions for summary judgment. The United Transportation Union and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers have filed briefs amicus curiae in support of plaintiff’s motion.
The facts are stipulated: Four employees of defendant went on duty on February 14, 1971, at Richmond, California. They operated one train…
2Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
- United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
- United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975