United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before DUNIWAY, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
The United States sued the Santa Fe Railway under 45 U.S.C. § 64a(a) for *1185statutory penalties for violations of the railroad Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64b. The only question is what Congress meant when it used the term “designated terminal” in 45 U.S.C. § 61(b)(3). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court refused to impose the penalties and entered judgment for the Santa Fe. United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., N.D.Cal., 1973, 363 F.Supp. 644. The government appeals,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1973
- United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
- United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United Transportation Union v. Ray LahoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014