Legal Opinion

United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1975No. 74--1061PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DUNIWAY, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.

The United States sued the Santa Fe Railway under 45 U.S.C. § 64a(a) for *1185statutory penalties for violations of the railroad Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64b. The only question is what Congress meant when it used the term “designated terminal” in 45 U.S.C. § 61(b)(3). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court refused to impose the penalties and entered judgment for the Santa Fe. United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., N.D.Cal., 1973, 363 F.Supp. 644. The government appeals,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1973
  3. United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
  3. United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
  4. United States v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United Transportation Union v. Ray LahoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API