Legal Opinion

United States v. 62 Cases, More or Less, Containing Six Jars of Jam, Etc

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1950No. 4039_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a libel brought by the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C.A. § 334(a), seeking the seizure and condemnation of 62 cases of fruit jam of assorted flavors. The libel alleged that the jam was misbranded within the meaning of 21 U.S. C.A. § 343(g), when introduced into and while in interstate commerce and while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce, because it purported to be and was represented as a fruit jam, a food for which definitions and standards of identity had been prescribed pursuant to 21 U.S.C.A. § 341, and it failed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Ten Cases, More or Less, Bred SpredCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. 716 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Del Comida Brand TomatoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. United States v. 30 Cases, More or Less, Leader Brand Strawberry Fruit SpreadDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
  5. 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API