United States v. 62 Cases, More or Less, Containing Six Jars of Jam, Etc
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a libel brought by the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C.A. § 334(a), seeking the seizure and condemnation of 62 cases of fruit jam of assorted flavors. The libel alleged that the jam was misbranded within the meaning of 21 U.S. C.A. § 343(g), when introduced into and while in interstate commerce and while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce, because it purported to be and was represented as a fruit jam, a food for which definitions and standards of identity had been prescribed pursuant to 21 U.S.C.A. § 341, and it failed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Ten Cases, More or Less, Bred SpredCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. 716 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Del Comida Brand TomatoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- State v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. 30 Cases, More or Less, Leader Brand Strawberry Fruit SpreadDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
- 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.