Legal Opinion

United States v. 716 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Del Comida Brand Tomatoes

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1950No. 3949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1040 et seq., 21 U.S.C.A. § 334(a), a libel of information was filed by the United States for the seizure and condemnation of 716 cases of canned food labeled in part “Del Comida Brand Tomatoes Contents 1 Lb. 3 Oz”. The libel alleged that the food was adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.A. § 342(b) (2) in that a product containing water had been substituted wholly or in part for canned tomatoes; and that the product was also misbranded within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.A. § 343(g) (1) in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Security Administrator v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. Two Bags, Each Containing 110 Pounds, Poppy SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. 36 Drums of Pop'n OilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. Allan Drug Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. DiMeglioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. United States v. 651 CASES, ETC.District Court, N.D. New York · 1953
  5. United States v. Bodine Produce Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API