Legal Opinion

United States v. Ten Cases, More or Less, Bred Spred

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1931No. 8984PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is. an appeal from a judgment after a directed verdict in favor of claimant, Glaser, Crandell Company, intervener, in a libel by the United States against ten cases, more or less, of Bred Spred, strawberry flavor, and other articles of food of similar character.

The libel proceedings were brought by virtue of the Food and Drugs Act, 21 USCA § 1 et seq. (34 Stat. 768). The libel contained three charges of adulteration and five charges of misbranding. The product involved was a food product, its use being indicated by its name.

The libel alleged a shipment in interstate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. The Maria MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. Two Bags, Each Containing 110 Pounds, Poppy SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  3. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. George A. Breon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Commonwealth v. DiMeglioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. United States v. 651 CASES, ETC.District Court, N.D. New York · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API