Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Burroughs

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 15, 1867PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Bill of interpleader, brought by the petitioners, a life insurance company, to compel the respondents to contest between themselves and have adjudicated their respective claims to a sum of money due to one of them from the petitioners, on a policy of insurance on the life, of George Kendall, deceased, in favor of his wife and children.

Read the full summary

Bill of interpleader, brought by the petitioners, a life insurance company, to compel the respondents to contest between themselves and have adjudicated their respective claims to a sum of money due to one of them from the petitioners, on a policy of insurance on the life, of George Kendall, deceased, in favor of his wife and children. The respondents were Jarvis E. Burroughs, who claimed the money due on the policy under an assignment of it from the wife of George Kendall before his death, and Henry S. Kendall, guardian of the only child of George Kendall and wife, and Loren P. Waldo,…

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

In 1850 the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company issued a policy of insurance on the life of George Kendall for the sum of five thousand dollars, payable to his wife, Mary E. Kendall, “ her executors, administrators or assigns, for her sole use, within ninety days after due notice and proof of the death of the said George Kendall, deducting therefrom all notes taken for premiums unpaid at that date.” The policy then provided as follows: — “And in case of the death of the said Mary E. Kendall before the decease of the said George Kendall, the amount of said insurance shall "be payable…

2Cited by42 opinions

  1. Continental Life Insurance v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Harley v. HeistIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Morgan v. . Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Millard v. BraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API