Legal Opinion
Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1966No. Civ. 29462PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Southern Pacific Company, as the owner of certain property abutting on South Alameda Street in Los Angeles, applied for a permit to build a warehouse thereon. When the city refused to issue such permit unless compliance was had with section 12.37 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, requiring petitioner to dedicate a portion of its property to the city for street widening purposes in accordance with its master plan of community development, Southern Pacific brought this mandamus proceeding to compel the issuance of such permit. The trial court having found against petitioner’s claims that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City of Corpus Christi v. Unitarian Church of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Richards Group of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Junta de PlanificaciónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.