Legal Opinion

Radley v. Seider

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff, a married woman, recovered a judgment against the defendant, a saloon keeper, from which he appeals to this Court.

The declaration charges defendant with unlawfully selling liquor to plaintiff’s husband between the 15th day of November, 1891, and the 14th day of April, 1892, and claims damages for injury to her feelings and means of support. The evidence shows that the plaintiff’s husband is, and for many years has been, an habitual drunkard, and that the defendant has been in the habit of selling intoxicating liquors to him during the period alleged. The plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Friend v. DunksMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. La Duke v. Township of ExeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. McMahon v. DumasMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Podbielski v. Argyle Bowl, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Spencer v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Michels v. Western Underwriters' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lucker v. LiskeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API