McNally v. Ward
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
This appeal, taken on a judgment roll, involves an action for personal injuries suffered by appellant when she fell from the rear porch of an apartment which she leased from respondent landlords. In contending that the trial court erred in ruling that respondents did not owe her a duty to maintain the porch and railing in a state of good repair, appellant would predicate such a duty upon any one of three bases: (1) an Alameda city ordinance; (2) the reservation by respondents of control over the landing guarded by the defective railing; or (3) an oral covenant by respondents to “maintain” the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Altz v. . LeibersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Audrey Whetzel, Frederick Whetzel, Jr., and Frederick Whetzel v. Jess Fisher Management Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Hinson v. DelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Halliday v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Grant v. HipsherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.