Legal Opinion
Hansel v. Sheridan
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 20, 1998No. 3:93-cv-01034PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Ronald Hansel brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. He also brings state law claims for assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. Defendants move for partial summary judgment and for ah order, in li-mine, precluding plaintiff from introducing certain evidence at trial.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Plaintiff Ronald Hansel resides in Rich-field Springs, New York. Defendant John Sheridan is an investigator for the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Llerando-Phipps v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Jackson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Moore v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Naccarato v. ScarselliDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Thomas v. County of PutnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.