Legal Opinion
In re Farrell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York at a term of the Appellate Division, Second Department, on March 14, 1917.
By the petition herein respondent is charged with having been guilty of misconduct as an attorney and counselor at law, as follows:
Commencing actions without making a proper and necessary investigation of the claim of his client and, more specifically, without making reasonable efforts to ascertain the contents of a survey *679referred to and made part of a contract of sale. The actions in question were brought in behalf of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crary v. . GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Klim v. SachsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Snow v. MonkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Wilhelm v. . FedergreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In re FeolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- In re MogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963