Legal Opinion

In re Mogel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 26, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent Mogel was admitted to the Bar in 1931 and has been in active practice since that time. In the petition before the court he has been charged with violating canons 29, 32 and 35 of the Canons of Ethics in that he represented numerous defendants in G-ambler’s Court not at the behest of these defendants but pursuant to a retainer or retainers from the employers of these defendants. The persons who allegedly engaged respondent’s services were conducting a policy operation and hired respondent to represent such of their collectors *204as might be arrested by the police. The consequence of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. In re FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. In re HerrmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API