Klim v. Sachs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Bachel Sachs, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in. favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Ki'ngs on the 18th day of March, 1904, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
The defendant, being the owner of the premises known as 89 Throop avenue, in the borougli of Brooklyn, entered into a written agreement with the plaintiff whereby the plaintiff agreed to purchase the property for the sum of $9,800, and the defendant agreed to convey the same by a full covenant warranty deed free of all incumbrances, except three certain mortgages specified in the agreement. The plaintiff paid to the defendant $300 on account of the purchase price specified in the contract, but when the time arrived for passing the title the plaintiff refused to accept the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- King's Heirs and Others v. Thompson and WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Gibert v. . PetelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Webster v. Kings County Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Volz v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Smithers v. SteinerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
3Cited by21 opinions
- Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Empire Realty Corp. v. SayreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Massey v. TyraSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Occidental Realty Co. v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Harder v. AllredCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.