Marshall v. Department of Agriculture
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
Appellants contend that C. S., sec. 2031, as amended by chap. 50, 1923 Session Laws, page 57, and C. S., secs. 2032 and 2033, and the regulations of the Department of Agriculture promulgated thereunder, with reference to white potatoes, are unconstitutional, because unreasonable, unjust, discriminatory, and depriving appellants of their property without due process of law in violation of the 14th amendment of the United States constitution and sections 1 and 13 of art. 1 of the Idaho constitution.
These sections, after a preliminary recitation that the business of farm marketing is of public…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Mead v. ArnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Howard v. MissmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Chambers v. McCollumIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. MacEy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.