Donna Ebeyer and Glenn Ebeyer v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Senior Judge.
Now pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Defendant’s motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for decision. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor required by the court. Because the court concludes that plaintiffs’ claim is time-barred under § 6511(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 6511(b)(2)(A) (2012), defendant’s motion is granted. 1
BACKGROUND 2
Donna and Glenn Ebeyer 3 filed their 2006 joint federal income tax return…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014