Simmons v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C § 1491; Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); Tax Refund Claim; Full Payment Rule; Wrongful Levy Claim; 26 U.S.C. § 7426
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Although not specifically pled as such, the pro se plaintiff in this case appears to seek a federal income tax refund as a result of the Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) denial of claimed deductions for (1) ordinary and necessary business…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Du v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Lofton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Schroeder v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.