Hirsch and Schuman v. Dabbs and Mivelaz
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The state of Arkansas brought suit in the Sebastian chancery court, Fort Smith District, for the confirmation of title to numerous town lots and tracts of land which had been forfeited and certified to the state for the nonpayment of taxes. The suit was begun under authority conferred by act 119 of the Acts of 1935, p. 318. Section 6 of this act reads as follows:
“ Section 6. Any person, firm, corporation, or improvement district claiming any interest in any tract or parcel of land adverse to the state shall have the right to-be made a party to the suit, and, if made a party, the claims of any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matthews v. ByrdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Smith v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Magness v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Tindall v. SearanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Keith v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fuller v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Lumsden v. ErstineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Cecil v. Tisher and FriendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Berry v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Redfern v. DaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.