Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Byrd
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 15, 1933No. 4-3094PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This appeal involves the constitutionality of §§ 5 and 6 of House Bill No. 559, which, after its final passage, became act 250 of the Acts of 1933. The Secretary of State has certified that this bill, having remained with the Governor twenty days,' the General Assembly not being in session, became a law March 30, 1933.
The title to this bill, when introduced in the House, was “A bill for an act to be entitled: ‘An act to fix the compensation of county officers,’ ” and this title was. not changed.
The legislative journals show that the bill, having-been passed in the House, was amended in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Turpin v. LemonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- State v. HurlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Conway v. SummersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Cook v. BevillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Baker Refrigeration Systems, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Hirsch and Schuman v. Dabbs and MivelazSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Barclay v. MeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.