Legal Opinion

Lumsden v. Erstine

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 1943No. 4-7077PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcFaddin, J.

This cause involves an attack upon a tax sale and confirmation proceedings. The property (80 acres) was sold or forfeited to the state in 1930 for taxes of 1929 and was certified to the state ixx 1932. In 1936, this tract of 80 acrés, along with other lands, was confirmed to the state in a confirmation proceeding under act 1191 of 1935. In 1939, the appellees received their deed from the state.

The lands had forfeited in 1930 in the name of Missouri State Life Insurance Company as the owner; and in 1938 the appellant, Lumsden, obtained his deed by mesne conveyances from the said owner. In…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Freeman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Fuller v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. Goodrum v. AyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  4. Hirsch and Schuman v. Dabbs and MivelazSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Berry v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lind v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
  3. Duncan v. Board of Dir. of Newport Levee Dist.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Plant v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API