Legal Opinion

State v. Loewenthal

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1928No. 21123. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The defendant, O. ft. Loewenthal, was charged with the crime of grand larceny, ft was alleged that he falsely and fraudulently represented to Hazel G. Stuver that the North American Finance Company had repossessed a certain Cunningham motor ambulance from one C. L. Winters, of Portland, because of failure to keep up payments due on the ambulance; and that she, believing and relying on the false and fraudulent representations and being deceived by them, paid to the defendant eighteen hundred dollars in lawful money for the ambulance; whereas, in truth and in fact, C. L. Winters was, at all…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Legal Adjustment Bureau v. West Coast Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fagerdahl v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fagerdahl v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API