Holston v. Pennington
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
In this appeal from a decree of specific performance, we must consider whether the seller of land at an “absolute auction” may “block” various parcels together, whether a successful bid recorded by the auctioneer satisfies the statute of frauds, and whether the auctioneer may bid at the sale. We affirm the decree.
Joseph K. Holston and his wife were the owners of two tracts of land in Smyth County containing about eighty acres in the aggre gate. The tracts were not contiguous, but were close together. The owners divided the first tract into four lots, each of which was traversed by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schwartz v. Capital Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Perry Trading Co. v. City of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Pitchfork Ranch Co. v. Bar TlWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Zuhak v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- In re General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Premier Container Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marten v. StaabNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- 146 Dundas Corp. v. Chemical BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Marten v. StaabNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
- Yaffe v. Heritage Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Golfinopoulos v. PadulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.