Legal Opinion

Zuhak v. Rose

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Defendant’s appeal rests principally on his contention that there is no contract between plaintiff and defendant; hence specific performance of one may not be ordered.

We consider that a contract did arise out of the facts and circumstances of this auction whereby defendant’s offer to sell to the highest bidder without reserve was accepted by plaintiff with his bid of $41,000. The letter by Bohr to Mr. and Mrs. Rose whereby he engaged to find a purchaser at a price satisfactory to the Roses in order to be entitled to a commission is immaterial here, however relevant it might be in an action by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. GriswoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kreutzer v. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Thorp Sales Corp. v. Gyuro Grading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Holston v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Pitchfork Ranch Co. v. Bar TlWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Del Rio Land, Inc. v. HaumontCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API