Zuhak v. Rose
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant’s appeal rests principally on his contention that there is no contract between plaintiff and defendant; hence specific performance of one may not be ordered.
We consider that a contract did arise out of the facts and circumstances of this auction whereby defendant’s offer to sell to the highest bidder without reserve was accepted by plaintiff with his bid of $41,000. The letter by Bohr to Mr. and Mrs. Rose whereby he engaged to find a purchaser at a price satisfactory to the Roses in order to be entitled to a commission is immaterial here, however relevant it might be in an action by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. GriswoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Kreutzer v. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by16 opinions
- Forbes v. Wells Beach Casino, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Thorp Sales Corp. v. Gyuro Grading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Holston v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Pitchfork Ranch Co. v. Bar TlWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Del Rio Land, Inc. v. HaumontCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.