Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dickerson v. Tokstad

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is a filiation proceeding brought under sections 16-901 to 16-914, Oregon Code 1930. The proceeding was instituted on the relation of Fay Dickerson, an unmarried woman and the mother of an illegitimate child born July 15, 1930. The defendant was charged with being the father of the child, which he denied. The cause was submitted to a jury and a verdict returned, finding defendant guilty as charged, and, from the resultant judgment, defendant has appealed.

Defendant assigns errer in the refusal of the court to grant his motion for a nonsuit. He bases this assignment solely upon the,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hutchinson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State v. NewmanOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. Burghart v. HaslebacherOregon Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. ColtonOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. In Re Rowe's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. F. v. M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API