Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Maryland/Delaware Cable Television Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 11, 1987No. 159, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

The question before us in this appeal is whether the Public Service Commission of Maryland (PSC) has jurisdiction to regulate “pole attachment” agreements between utility companies and cable television companies.

We set forth the following facts to place the issue in proper focus. Cable television companies provide programming to their subscribers by running coaxial cables, either underground or above ground on poles, from their transmission centers to the television sets of their customers. Because of practical, economic, and aesthetic reasons, nearly all cable television lines…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc. v. Health Services Cost Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Illinois-Indiana Cable Television Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Miles v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  5. Public Service Commission v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API