Legal Opinion

Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corp.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided August 11, 2006No. 4:05-cv-00146Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEVER, District Judge.

On November 2, 2005, plaintiff Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/New-house Partnership (“plaintiff’ or “TWE-AN”) filed suit for declaratory relief against defendant Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corporation (“defendant” or “CCEMC”) relating to the pole-attachment rate that defendant is attempting to charge plaintiff for attaching its cables to defendant’s utility poles. On December 27, 2005, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which plaintiff opposed. On February 7, 2006,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Kloth v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API