Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corp.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVER, District Judge.
On November 2, 2005, plaintiff Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/New-house Partnership (“plaintiff’ or “TWE-AN”) filed suit for declaratory relief against defendant Carteret-Craven Electric Membership Corporation (“defendant” or “CCEMC”) relating to the pole-attachment rate that defendant is attempting to charge plaintiff for attaching its cables to defendant’s utility poles. On December 27, 2005, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which plaintiff opposed. On February 7, 2006,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Kloth v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.