Legal Opinion
Knight Adjustment v. Funaro
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided June 24, 2021No. 20190779-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2021 UT App 65
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS KNIGHT ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, Appellee, v. MICHAEL FUNARO, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190779-CA Filed June 24, 2021 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable James D. Gardner No. 120405055 Ronald Ady, Attorney for Appellant Jay V. Barney, Attorney for Appellee JUDGE DIANA HAGEN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES DAVID N. MORTENSEN and RYAN M. HARRIS concurred. HAGEN, Judge: ¶1 Michael Funaro successfully moved to set aside a default judgment obtained against him by Knight Adjustment Bureau (Knight) on the grounds that he was never…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Jackson Const. Co., Inc. v. MarrsUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American United v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
- Ogden Regional Airport Association v. Ogden City AirportDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023