Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1932No. 6462PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBSTER, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree in equity enjoining in part the enforcement of an award of compensation made to appellant Winkler, an injured longshoreman, by the appellant Marshall, deputy commissioner for-the fourteenth district under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act of March 4, 1927, 44 Stat. 1424 (33 USCA §§ 901-950). The question presented for decision calls for an interpretation of the act with respect to the method of ascertaining or computing the amount of compensation to be paid an injured workman entitled to the benefits of the act. The…

2Cited by43 opinions

  1. Sam D. Matulic v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Jones Stevedoring Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Muckleshoot Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Tri-State Terminals, Inc. v. JesseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API