Legal Opinion

Sommerfield v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 20, 2008No. 06 C 3132PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.

Before the court is an objection to Magistrate Judge Cole’s order issued on May 6, 2008 (the “Order”), in which Judge Cole denied plaintiffs discovery motions. The plaintiff, Detlef Sommerfield (“Sommerfield”), timely filed objections to the Order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a); id. at 72. For the reasons stated below, Sommerfield’s objections are overruled.

I. Background

Sommerfield’s Rule 72 motion reflects the latest in a series of contentious discovery battles in this case. On May 6, 2008, Judge Cole issued a minute order that read:

Motion hearing held and…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  3. Surgery Center at 900 North Michigan Avenue, LLC v. American Physicians Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API