Legal Opinion
American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 24, 1997No. 95-5153, 95-5154PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN.
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Congress prohibited the expenditure by the Department of Defense (“DOD”) of federal funds for certain types of research and development contracts. This ease is about the consequences, legal and financial, to a contractor and to the Government when they perform a purported contract made in apparent violation of the Congressional prohibition of expenditure of money in that manner.
American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT & T”) entered into a contract with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Lucent Technologies Inc., United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- The Cessna Aircraft Company v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Enron Federal Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.