Legal Opinion

John Ferro, Harry Lauda and Jerome J. Gagliano, on Behalf of Themselves, and All Those Similarly Situated v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 3, 1961No. 46, Docket 26358PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs seek to appeal from an order of Judge Palmieri, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1960, 183 F.Supp. 417, which (1) granted defendants’ motion to dismiss so much of the plaintiffs’ complaint as purported to allege a federal question under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 157 et seq., grounded upon the allegation that defendants hostilely discriminated against the plaintiffs in connection with work assignments; but (2) allowed plaintiffs to pursue their state common law cause of action wherein they allege their wrongful discharge from employment if they within 30 days amend their complaint so as to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Calore Rigging Corp. v. Sterling Engineering & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Hayden v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. John Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API