Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Enforma Natural Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 8, 2004No. 02-56842, 02-57078PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We consolidate these appeals for purposes of review and this opinion. Enforma Natural Products, Inc. (“Enforma”) asks us to quash two separate preliminary injunctions issued by District Judge J. Spencer Letts (before this case was reassigned to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson) restricting the sale and marketing of Enforma’s diet supplement products. Both appeals focus on irregular procedures employed by the district court. In appeal No. 02-56842, Enforma argues that the district court improperly relied on a court-appointed expert and issued insufficient findings of fact…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Drakes Bay Oyster Company v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Jeff Boardman v. Pacific Seafood GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- In Re Focus Media Inc., Debtor, Thomas E. Rubin v. John P. Pringle, Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.